Case Study

180 cadence, still overstriding

180 cadence, still overstriding

— Chad

Situation

Chasing sub-19 5K and sub-40 10K off 50km per week, mostly recovered from a right ankle sprain.

Findings

Cadence at 180 with good hip mechanics and a proper ankle-driven lean, but still landing ahead of his body. Cadence and landing position are independent variables. Hitting 180 doesn’t automatically fix overstriding.

Outcome

Specific landing cues plus a recovery-driven shoe suggestion: using a carbon-plated shoe for the longer sessions that left him beat up. He confirmed by email and public review that it worked.

Chad was chasing a sub-19 5K and a sub-40 10K, training around 50 kilometers a week and mostly recovered from a right ankle sprain.

On video, his cadence was already at 180, his hip mechanics looked good, and he had a proper ankle-driven lean. But he was still landing ahead of his body. I see this often. Cadence and landing position are independent variables. Hitting 180 doesn’t automatically fix overstriding, and Chad’s case showed that clearly.

I gave him specific landing cues to close that gap, along with a recovery-driven shoe suggestion, a carbon-plated shoe for the longer sessions that were leaving him beat up. He confirmed by email and in a public review that it worked.

Want cues built around how you actually run? Book your online gait analysis.